I was never a reluctant reader. I have to admit, I feared writing about this topic because it is something I know very little about. While my parents were not avid readers, they were willing to drive me to the library. When I was very young, I was confined to bed because of a long illness. I found solace in reading. I learned to read at a young age, and I read everything. I loved action/adventure stories. When I was finally healthy, I couldn’t run fast enough, all the time running about, creating my own adventures. And when I wasn’t running about, I was reading.
Ezra Jack Keat's APT 3 |
Of course, I didn’t have computers, iPhones or iPads or video games way back then. There was no Facebook or text talk. Ooo! I shudder to think how Sister Alice Marie might have reacted if I dared write into an essay, AFINIAFI (A friend in need is a friend indeed)!
Although, to be sure, nerds will be nerds, no matter which century, and kids will always be kids. A friend and I had learned Morse code, and then tapped out messages during class. Colonel Seese, the retired Army colonel who taught history, caught on. He was scarier than the nuns. While he approved of our ingenuity, we still had to serve detention.
Those were different times. I have to wonder if there may be some connection between the gadgetry of today and reluctant readers. As much as these electronic gizmos can be an aid to our learning process, might they also be a deterrent? I wrote in my last post (here) about current studies that suggest old-fashion hand writing helps cognitive development, critical thinking skills, and reading skills. Connected to this is another important question, how does the new technology we use to read change the way we read? Are we still reading as thoroughly and attentively? As Jabr Ferris suggests (Scientific American, 2013), while studies are still ongoing, there seems to be a consensus that “modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that many people miss and, more importantly, prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way.”
Where The Wild Things Are |
For more information, you might find this interesting: Jabr, Ferris. The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens. (Scientific American, April 2013)
Don't forget about the CWIM giveaway!
What do you think? Share some of your insights, experiences and strategies below!
Bobbi Miller
10 comments:
Thanks for sharing the article, Bobbi. Some fascinating stuff!
Thank you, Carmela! This was a hard piece to write, but what an interesting subject!
Loved this article, Bobbi. Thank you.
I pinned to my Writing Help etc on Pinterest: http://www.pinterest.com/margotfinke/
Books for Kids -
FREE Skype Author Visits
How insightful, Bobbi.
Thank you!
I'm always seeking research re reading TXT vs. reading books, and for obvious reasons. :)
This is so interesting! At the library I work at we were recently discussing whether many of today's youngest children will miss out entirely on the pleasure of books. Magazines, too. I can still remember the thrill of having a shiny new children's magazine (with MY name on it) arrive in the mail, chock-full of stories and pictures for me to explore.
From one odd girl out to another, Bobbi, I really enjoyed reading this. And I've wondered also if there is a link between modern gadgetry and reluctant readers.
Thank you so much for sharing this, Margot! And thank you for your kind words!
You are right, Esther. It's a fascinating subject!
Thank you, Marcia, for stopping by. And I think you are right on the mark with that insight. Young readers are missing out on something, and I sense we are just beginning to see the consequences of what that 'something' might be in regards to literacy, problem-solving, critical thinking (and so on).
Yes, Rebecca!! Old Girls Rule!
Post a Comment